Visit bluecollarbytes's column >>

BLUECOLLARBYTES

Observational Trial Balloons
Add To Watchlist
Articles Posted: 56; Links Seeded: 987
Member Since: 10/2007Last Seen: 11/19/2009

Food Crisis Starts Eclipsing Climate Change Worries

advertisement

Gore Ducks, as a Backlash Builds Against Biofuels
By JOSH GERSTEIN, Staff Reporter of the Sun | April 25, 2008

The campaign against climate change could be set back by the global food crisis, as foreign populations turn against measures to use foodstuffs as substitutes for fossil fuels.

Published to:

What's this?
Who's leading the conversation?
This visualization below allows you to see the impact that each user has on the current conversation. The top row contains the group of users who have had the most impact, the 2nd row the group of users who have had the 2nd most impact (et cetera). Users with similar impact are grouped together, and the average score of the group is shown to the left of the group. The author of the article is also shown on the left, in their corresponding group. Each user's score is based on the number of comments the user has made plus the number of votes their comments have received. The scores are calculated relative one another, so while their absolute value is not particularly important, their relative difference does indicate a larger difference in impact on the conversation.
5.5
1.1
{"commentId":1732563,"authorDomain":"bluecollarbytes"}

excerpt 2: "With prices for rice, wheat, and corn soaring, food-related unrest has broken out in places such as Haiti, Indonesia, and Afghanistan. Several countries have blocked the export of grain. There is even talk that governments could fall if they cannot bring food costs down"

{"commentId":1732563,"threadId":"255419","contentId":"1452310","authorDomain":"bluecollarbytes"}
  • 1 vote
Reply#1 - Fri Apr 25, 2008 9:25 AM EDT
{"commentId":1732564,"authorDomain":"bluecollarbytes"}

excerpt 3:"One factor being blamed for the price hikes is the use of government subsidies to promote the use of corn for ethanol production. An estimated 30% of America's corn crop now goes to fuel, not food."

{"commentId":1732564,"threadId":"255419","contentId":"1452310","authorDomain":"bluecollarbytes"}
  • 1 vote
Reply#2 - Fri Apr 25, 2008 9:26 AM EDT
{"commentId":1732578,"authorDomain":"bluecollarbytes"}

excerpt 4:""It takes around 400 pounds of corn to make 25 gallons of ethanol," Mr. Senauer, also an applied economics professor at Minnesota, said. "It's not going to be a very good diet but that's roughly enough to keep an adult person alive for a year."

{"commentId":1732578,"threadId":"255419","contentId":"1452310","authorDomain":"bluecollarbytes"}
  • 1 vote
Reply#3 - Fri Apr 25, 2008 9:28 AM EDT
{"commentId":1732905,"authorDomain":"DrKnow"}

This is the result of the "chicken little" effect. "Something has to be done, anything".

Ethanol is energy neutral. It costs as much in conventional energy to produce as it provides. It does NOTHING for the environment. It only makes some people (mostly politicians) feel good that they "did" something about the problem.

A few more of these "solutions" will result in the "boy who cried wolf" response. When a real solution is developed, no one will listen.

{"commentId":1732905,"threadId":"255419","contentId":"1452310","authorDomain":"DrKnow"}
  • 3 votes
Reply#4 - Fri Apr 25, 2008 10:41 AM EDT
{"commentId":1733122,"authorDomain":"seward"}

The sooner that Frenchman who has developed an engine that runs on compressed air is allowed to market it, the better.

Air cars are the future, not electric, nor ethanol, and most certainly not oil.

{"commentId":1733122,"threadId":"255419","contentId":"1452310","authorDomain":"seward"}
  • 1 vote
#4.1 - Fri Apr 25, 2008 11:22 AM EDT
{"commentId":1734256,"authorDomain":"wingod"}
The sooner that Frenchman who has developed an engine that runs on compressed air is allowed to market it, the better.

It requires electrical power to fill that air, which requires oil or nuclear or solar.

{"commentId":1734256,"threadId":"255419","contentId":"1452310","authorDomain":"wingod"}
  • 3 votes
#4.2 - Fri Apr 25, 2008 2:57 PM EDT
{"commentId":1734960,"authorDomain":"PurelyPolitical"}

Solved. Welcome to Utopia citizen.

{"commentId":1734960,"threadId":"255419","contentId":"1452310","authorDomain":"PurelyPolitical"}
  • 3 votes
#4.3 - Fri Apr 25, 2008 5:41 PM EDT
Reply
{"commentId":1733394,"authorDomain":"jdl-28"}

Do you think that maybe they would just like to get the price up, everything is blame on fuel for cars. One thing we produce wheat in this country we will not be short if we didn't ship it out to all the other country. Come on everyone is trying to get more money out of you and this is there new way. How many cars are depending on total ethanol not enough yet to cause a food shortage and that would be corn only so where is the rice and wheat is coming into the picture.

Global warming is causing everything now, gee how fast thing take off causing problem before anyone can prove global warming is even going to happen. This country live in fear of their own Shadow, and we talk about it one day and the next we have food shortages.

Let solve the problem we keep all our food in this country and produce our own oil and than we do not need anything from any other country. Now we will have lots of food and oil.

{"commentId":1733394,"threadId":"255419","contentId":"1452310","authorDomain":"jdl-28"}
    Reply#5 - Fri Apr 25, 2008 12:14 PM EDT
    {"commentId":1736101,"authorDomain":"backroadsbubba"}

    A non-food biofuel appears to be the better course right now, even with ethanol's two valuable co-products.

    {"commentId":1736101,"threadId":"255419","contentId":"1452310","authorDomain":"backroadsbubba"}
    • 2 votes
    Reply#6 - Sat Apr 26, 2008 2:17 AM EDT
    {"commentId":1738884,"authorDomain":"bluecollarbytes"}

    What's wrong with 'shipping food' out of the country? We get loads of food stuffs from all over. There is such a thing as global commerce, {not Globalization} which is responsible for raising living standards and knowledge, which is as old as nations are.

    I find it curious that those who're inclined to blame America for the world's ills refuse to see the real potential danger of burning up food supplies for no net economic or environmental benefit, at the cost of rising food prices throughout the world, which will bring us levels of resentment we've not seen before.

    Imagine a country which refuses to develop its own energy resources so that folks on the mainland can "feel good" about a few acres in Alaska, not have to see wind farms on Cape Cod, or risk property values on Florida's coast.

    Our priorities are screwed up. We're spoiled.

    Bio-fuels may make better sense some day, especially if they can be made from various waste by-products or refuse. But a constant readily available affordable supply of food is required. Food-fuel is not, and now threatens to demonize us in new ways, real ways that impact real people the world over.

    {"commentId":1738884,"threadId":"255419","contentId":"1452310","authorDomain":"bluecollarbytes"}
    • 3 votes
    Reply#7 - Sun Apr 27, 2008 8:17 AM EDT
    {"canLink":false,"threadId":"255419","isPrivate":false}
    Leave a Comment:
    You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
    As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.
    {"threadId":"255419","contentId":"1452310"}
    Start TrackingStart Tracking
    Stop TrackingStop Tracking